Activity

@aubrey-miller @jbauer I think it’s coral too but I don’t think it’s Acropora. I’ve worked with modern Acropora from the Maldives and what really defines that genus are large, distinct corallites (calcified tubes where the polyp is) which I do not see evidence of in this specimen. While this genus is notorious for taking on different growth forms depending on its environment I believe the corallite part is constant.

I’d agree with the fossil coral @mackenzie-smith and @jbauer mentioned. I’m afraid I won’t be able to clarify it further. Although, the typical preservation of this agatized coral specimen is interesting. In the second photo features what appear to be some druzy brown/orange crystals. The original coral material has been replaced by silica (provided by ocean water, diatoms, or even clay) and created a pseudomorph. The new material is probably chalcedony, which is a material many stone tools are made of. Many of the deposits in this region are from more recent sediments (Pleistocene/Holocene) but I imagine this coral could possibly be from older deposits from that area like the Hawthorn Group, Arcadia Formation, Tampa Member (https://mrdata.usgs.gov/geology/state/sgmc-unit.php?unit=FLOGMIhat%3B0). All in all, cool find!