-
Jack Kallmeyer posted a new specimen. 6 years, 10 months ago
6 years, 10 months ago6 years, 10 months agoJack Kallmeyer has contributed specimen mFeM 50077 to myFOSSIL!
Jack Kallmeyer posted a new specimen. 6 years, 10 months ago
Jack Kallmeyer has contributed specimen mFeM 50077 to myFOSSIL!
FOSSIL UPLOAD
First, make sure you have a myFOSSIL account, this is required to upload your fossil information. If you are interested in seeing if your fossil can be used for research purposes, please follow through the following steps. They walk you through the information needed and why it is helpful for other scientists to use it for research questions. Even if the information you have on your fossil is not enough to be used for research purposes it will still benefit the community through educational means and help others identify their fossils. Specimens that have sufficient information will be uploaded to iDigBio and GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility) for public accessibility.
If you have already gone through the stepwise process that explains each piece of data please click through to a summary tab where you can enter in your specimen data on a single page.
Data Quality Information Page
Hi, @jkallmeyer I have done some research on how other collections include trace fossil data and it seems like we will include Kingdom Animalia > Phylum Ichnofossil > include ichnogenus and species in the genus and species boxes — and if you want to include trace maker information it can be put in the field notes section.
Does that seem…[Read more]
That sounds right although I did not include the actual trace fossil taxonomy which I probably do not know. I included the taxonomy of the possible trace maker. Poor form… but my original purpose wasn’t to do a proper museum label but rather to show people what a trace fossil from a given critter looked like.
That’s why I’m around, to help with figuring out the correct information! I would think this would be Diplichnites (generic assignment) – very common for arthropod trackways.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diplichnites
https://www.trilobites.info/trace.htm
http://ichnology.ku.edu/invertebrate_traces/tfimages/diplichnites.html
Hope this is…[Read more]
I go by Osgood’s work wherein he discusses Cincinnatian arthropod trackways under different genera stating, “there is considerable doubt as to the true affinities of the commonly mentioned genera of supposed trilobite tracks… Diplichnites” (p352, 355). So each of the trackways I have submitted would have different ichnogenera and none would be…[Read more]
I don’t have access to Osgood’s book at this moment. I was taught that it’s bad form to name the track after the tracemaker because many different animals can make similar tracks.
If you want to follow Osgood, that is fine just include the year of the publication in the notes so someone else can follow in your steps. As you currently have it,…[Read more]
Osgood doesn’t necessarily name them to specific trace maker but the names vary based upon their morphology. I think there are at least three versions all possibly attributed to Isotelus. The terms Osgood uses at least have an ichnospecies name while I am not aware of the same with Diplichnites.
There are many species of Diplichnites, let me know what Osgood refers to the species as when you get a chance to reference the volume.