-
Jim Barkley posted a new specimen. 2 years, 10 months ago
2 years, 10 months ago2 years, 10 months agoJim Barkley has contributed specimen mFeM 76751 to myFOSSIL!
Jim Barkley posted a new specimen. 2 years, 10 months ago
Jim Barkley has contributed specimen mFeM 76751 to myFOSSIL!
FOSSIL UPLOAD
First, make sure you have a myFOSSIL account, this is required to upload your fossil information. If you are interested in seeing if your fossil can be used for research purposes, please follow through the following steps. They walk you through the information needed and why it is helpful for other scientists to use it for research questions. Even if the information you have on your fossil is not enough to be used for research purposes it will still benefit the community through educational means and help others identify their fossils. Specimens that have sufficient information will be uploaded to iDigBio and GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility) for public accessibility.
If you have already gone through the stepwise process that explains each piece of data please click through to a summary tab where you can enter in your specimen data on a single page.
Data Quality Information Page
@jim-barkley This might be a series of suggested taxa so there might be several posts. The lighter leaf (edges of picture) could be Winteraceae or Berberaceae.
MacKenzie I think the lighter one is Allophylus flexifolia. The darker one is the question mark. Also, I didn’t know how to handle two specimens on a single plate. The database is a little restrictive.
Hi @jim-barkley! I certainly see the overall shape and asymmetrical base as being similar to Allophylus. However, the secondary veins of Allophyllus are crasspidodromous meaning that they go directly to the margin. The veins on this leaf bifurcate before they get to the margin. There are also several intersecondaries which is something I don’t see…[Read more]
Thank-you, Mackenzie. I will re-shoot this and try again.
@mackenzie-smith were you able to narrow down the ID on this one?
@vperez and @jim-barkley I can’t see the venation on the dark one. It’s too dark. The overall shape looks Salix like (willow). Salix has been described from the GRF in 1934 by Brown. This image is just for the darker one. The lighter one has it’s own specimen number and image.
MacKenzie Smith I added some pics that show a little venation as well as a Salix that should illustrate the differences. Thanks for looking.