-
Brad Warne posted a new specimen in the group
What is it? from the myFOSSIL app 2 years, 9 months ago
2 years, 9 months ago2 years, 9 months agoBrad Warne has contributed specimen mFeM 83586 to myFOSSIL!
Brad Warne posted a new specimen in the group What is it? from the myFOSSIL app 2 years, 9 months ago
Brad Warne has contributed specimen mFeM 83586 to myFOSSIL!
FOSSIL UPLOAD
First, make sure you have a myFOSSIL account, this is required to upload your fossil information. If you are interested in seeing if your fossil can be used for research purposes, please follow through the following steps. They walk you through the information needed and why it is helpful for other scientists to use it for research questions. Even if the information you have on your fossil is not enough to be used for research purposes it will still benefit the community through educational means and help others identify their fossils. Specimens that have sufficient information will be uploaded to iDigBio and GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility) for public accessibility.
If you have already gone through the stepwise process that explains each piece of data please click through to a summary tab where you can enter in your specimen data on a single page.
Data Quality Information Page
I find many fossil images that show an structure exactly like this in ‘Nautiloid cephalopods’. Also in all anatomical drawings of orthocone cephalopods. It’s the siphuncle. The cavity are the camera.
I disagree. This isn’t the complete creature it’s only the part of the phragmocone that contains the the siphuncle and camera. Also there actually is no whorl as a gastropod would have. Look at the lines that demark the sections.
Hm. Well now I’m confused.
How big is this?
Thats a beautiful orthocone specimen! The septa and siphuncle are nicely preserved. I’m curious about the deposits lining the camerae. Are those cameral deposits or are they just artifacts of the mineralization process?
That’s an orthocone, and that’s final
@leonardo-miranda thank you
Dang.
The top half looks complete though, and it doesn’t end in a point like orthacones do
It is not complete. It doesn’t look complete. It is a portion of the animal’s anatomy. It is an interesting fossil because it clearly shows the internal structure of what made these animals unique
I just really don’t like orthacones. They’ve tried to eat me before.
@a-trilobite at least you evolved great eyesight before those calamari jerks did
@leonardo-miranda yeah those guys can be a real pain in the pygidium.