@bill-heim, I’ll add this tooth as cf. Tyrannosaurus rex? Does that sound as an acceptable ID?

@bill-heim, excuse me. I must have missed this comment. I added a picture of the base. Not easy but if it’s not a good one let me know and I’ll add another one.

@smoran, are the new ones better? If not let me know so I can add some more.

@vperez, you could very Well be right. I know next to nothing about mammals. More of a reptile Guy. I trusted the ID given. Any ideas What the most precise ID would be?

@vperez, it could very Well be, but it’s a bit the same like in the Kem Kem beds, where some say all Spinosaurid Teeth are Spinosaurus, while others (including me) believe there are at least two different genera. I’ll update it to Edmontia, but I’ll add it in the notes that it was originally Identified as Denversaurus.

@smoran, done.

@smoran, What more Angles do you need to confirm it. It’s a Mosasaur tooth with intensive feeding wear.

@smoran, done 🙂

@vperez, I could narrow it down to Huangbangi Valley, Beipiao, but that is from research on the internet, and not information that Came with the Fossil. It’s indeed Jehol group, don’t know what happened there. Thanks for pointing out.

@vperez, done 🙂

@vperez, the ID was confirmed by the Dinosaur expert on the fossilforum. For now I stick with it.

@smoran, fixed it.

@vperez, @bill-heim, thank you guys 🙂

@smoran, these might be a bit better. I changed the background.

@smoran Thanks, I’ve updated it.

@Smoran, woops, my bad, I fixed it.

@vperez, updated, thanks again 🙂

@vperez, thank you 🙂

Hello @smoran , sorry again, seems like the updates on this one weren’t saved either. I Found out it’s indeed upper Jurassic.

@smoran, I don’t think anyone knows the geology of these. I think the formation is not even named yet, but I’m not sure. This really is all the information the internet is willing to give me.