-
Jacob Q. M. Polzin posted a new activity comment 3 years, 8 months ago
3 years, 8 months ago3 years, 8 months agoHey @vperez , is this a crocodile tooth or have I misidentified a cetacean tooth like the last two times? Thanks!
-
Mackenzie Ross posted a new activity comment 3 years, 8 months ago
3 years, 8 months ago3 years, 8 months agoHi @charlie-smith looks awesome! @bill-heim or @vperez can check your ID, so we can mark it research grade!
-
Jennifer Bauer posted a new activity comment 3 years, 8 months ago
3 years, 8 months ago3 years, 8 months agoHi @vperez and @danita-brandt – I can’t say much past what Danita has already guessed. It’s possibly a columnal or a holdfast… certainly echinoderm material but not being super familiar with the location or formation I’m not much use.
-
Jennifer Bauer posted a new activity comment 3 years, 8 months ago
3 years, 8 months ago3 years, 8 months agoHi @vperez and @jacob-beasecker – I agree more with Jacob’s identification of Cayugaea. It is difficult to tell with a weathered corallite. Jacob do you have a copy of the Strata and Megafossils of the Middle Devonian Silica Formation? It was recently (last 6 ish years) reprinted with really nice images. Talk soon, Jen
-
Antony Avrithis posted a new activity comment 3 years, 8 months ago
3 years, 8 months ago3 years, 8 months ago -
Jacob Q. M. Polzin posted a new activity comment 3 years, 8 months ago
3 years, 8 months ago3 years, 8 months agoThank you so much for the support! @vperez
-
Charlie Smith posted a new activity comment 3 years, 8 months ago
3 years, 8 months ago3 years, 8 months agoHello @vperez, I’ve updated all the praecursor teeth to reflect this. Do you agree with this ID for this specimen? This tooth resembles a bit like C. hastalis to me, but the Suwannee river is typically known for Eocene shark teeth. It is possible that this could’ve came from younger hawthorn group sediments as I’m not aware of what part of the…[Read more]
-
Sam Ocon posted a new activity comment 3 years, 8 months ago
3 years, 8 months ago3 years, 8 months agoHi, @jacob-beasecker and @Vperez, I am sorry for being unclear here. I will attach some resources for you, Jacob, that may help with identification. http://michiganbasinfossils.org/ might be useful for comparisons, https://www.digitalatlasofancientlife.org/learn/cnidaria/anthozoa/rugosa/ will have some comparative specimens, as well as anatomical…[Read more]
-
Thijs Verbeke posted a new activity comment 3 years, 8 months ago
3 years, 8 months ago3 years, 8 months ago@vperez, you could very Well be right. I know next to nothing about mammals. More of a reptile Guy. I trusted the ID given. Any ideas What the most precise ID would be?
-
Thijs Verbeke posted a new activity comment 3 years, 8 months ago
3 years, 8 months ago3 years, 8 months ago@vperez, it could very Well be, but it’s a bit the same like in the Kem Kem beds, where some say all Spinosaurid Teeth are Spinosaurus, while others (including me) believe there are at least two different genera. I’ll update it to Edmontia, but I’ll add it in the notes that it was originally Identified as Denversaurus.
-
Thijs Verbeke posted a new activity comment 3 years, 8 months ago
3 years, 8 months ago3 years, 8 months ago@vperez, I could narrow it down to Huangbangi Valley, Beipiao, but that is from research on the internet, and not information that Came with the Fossil. It’s indeed Jehol group, don’t know what happened there. Thanks for pointing out.
-
Thijs Verbeke posted a new activity comment 3 years, 8 months ago
3 years, 8 months ago3 years, 8 months ago@vperez, done 🙂
-
Jacob Q. M. Polzin posted a new activity comment 3 years, 8 months ago
3 years, 8 months ago3 years, 8 months agoYeah no problem! I have difficulty telling the two species apart, can I ask what gave it away so I can better classify them in the future? @vperez
-
Jacob Beasecker posted a new activity comment 3 years, 8 months ago
3 years, 8 months ago3 years, 8 months agoHi @vperez, thank you for the information I have updated the page.
-
Thijs Verbeke posted a new activity comment 3 years, 8 months ago
3 years, 8 months ago3 years, 8 months ago@vperez, the ID was confirmed by the Dinosaur expert on the fossilforum. For now I stick with it.
-
MacKenzie Smith posted a new activity comment 3 years, 8 months ago
3 years, 8 months ago3 years, 8 months ago@vperez and @jim-barkley I can’t see the venation on the dark one. It’s too dark. The overall shape looks Salix like (willow). Salix has been described from the GRF in 1934 by Brown. This image is just for the darker one. The lighter one has it’s own specimen number and image.
-
Thijs Verbeke posted a new activity comment 3 years, 8 months ago
3 years, 8 months ago3 years, 8 months ago@vperez, @bill-heim, thank you guys 🙂
-
Mason Hintermeister posted a new activity comment 3 years, 8 months ago
3 years, 8 months ago3 years, 8 months ago@vperez that’s simply what the label said, could see it being a robust C. appendiculata. I’ll wait for Bill’s opinion before I change anything
-
MacKenzie Smith posted a new activity comment 3 years, 8 months ago
3 years, 8 months ago3 years, 8 months agoHi @mason-hintermeister and @vperez. To me it appears that there are multiple veins on each leaf? If this is the case, it is not in Lycopodiophyta since all members of this phylum/division only have a single xylem strand in their leaf. If there are multiple xylem strands (veins) per leaf then it is probably Cordaites. The higher taxonomy is highly…[Read more]
-
Thijs Verbeke posted a new activity comment 3 years, 8 months ago
3 years, 8 months ago3 years, 8 months ago@vperez, updated, thanks again 🙂
- Load More